Ecomed
Add a review FollowOverview
-
Founded Date September 27, 2016
-
Sectors CAAS
-
Posted Jobs 0
-
Viewed 5
Company Description
This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models
DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese synthetic intelligence business that develops open-source large language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and funded by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the company in 2023 and functions as its CEO.
The DeepSeek-R1 design supplies reactions comparable to other modern large language designs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a significantly lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of a similar LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI designs were established amidst United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were meant to limit the ability of these two nations to develop advanced AI systems. [6] [7]
On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its first totally free chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had actually exceeded ChatGPT as the most-downloaded free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia’s share rate to visit 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against larger and more established rivals has been explained as “upending AI”, [8] constituting “the first shot at what is becoming an international AI space race”, [11] and ushering in “a new era of AI brinkmanship”. [12]
DeepSeek makes its generative synthetic intelligence algorithms, models, and training details open-source, enabling its code to be freely available for usage, modification, watching, and designing files for developing purposes. [13] The company apparently strongly recruits young AI scientists from leading Chinese universities, [8] and hires from outside the computer science field to diversify its models’ understanding and abilities. [3]
In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI lover Liang Wenfeng, who had actually been trading because the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while going to Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund concentrated on establishing and utilizing AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer exclusively utilized AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has made its generative artificial intelligence chatbot open source, meaning its code is freely readily available for use, modification, and watching. This consists of permission to gain access to and use the source code, along with design documents, for developing purposes. [13]
According to 36Kr, Liang had developed a store of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government enforced AI chip constraints on China. [15]
In April 2023, High-Flyer started an artificial general intelligence laboratory devoted to research establishing AI tools separate from High-Flyer’s financial organization. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the laboratory became its own business, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Venture capital companies hesitated in supplying financing as it was not likely that it would be able to generate an exit in a brief time period. [15]
After releasing DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which used strong efficiency for a low cost, DeepSeek ended up being referred to as the catalyst for China’s AI model price war. It was rapidly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba began to cut the cost of their AI designs to take on the company. Despite the low rate charged by DeepSeek, it was successful compared to its competitors that were losing cash. [20]
DeepSeek is concentrated on research study and has no in-depth strategies for commercialization; [20] this also enables its innovation to avoid the most stringent arrangements of China’s AI guidelines, such as requiring consumer-facing technology to abide by the government’s controls on details. [3]
DeepSeek’s working with choices target technical capabilities rather than work experience, resulting in the majority of brand-new hires being either recent university graduates or designers whose AI professions are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the business hires people with no computer system science background to assist its technology comprehend other subjects and understanding areas, consisting of having the ability to produce poetry and carry out well on the notoriously difficult Chinese college admissions tests (Gaokao). [3]
Development and release history
DeepSeek LLM
On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is readily available totally free to both researchers and business users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license contract (“DeepSeek license”) concerning “open and accountable downstream use” for the model itself. [21]
They are of the same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed below. The series consists of 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]
1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base models.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of direction data. This produced the Instruct designs.
They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]
On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of models, with 7B and 67B parameters in both Base and Chat forms (no Instruct was launched). It was established to take on other LLMs readily available at the time. The paper declared benchmark outcomes higher than a lot of open source LLMs at the time, particularly Llama 2. [26]: area 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the model itself. [27]
The architecture was essentially the like those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text obtained by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]
The Chat versions of the two Base designs was also released simultaneously, obtained by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]
On 9 January 2024, they released 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B specifications (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They claimed comparable efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a version of the standard sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared experts” that are constantly queried, and “routed experts” that may not be. They discovered this to aid with expert balancing. In standard MoE, some specialists can become overly relied on, while other experts might be rarely utilized, wasting parameters. Attempting to stabilize the experts so that they are equally utilized then triggers professionals to reproduce the exact same capacity. They proposed the shared professionals to discover core capacities that are typically utilized, and let the routed specialists to discover the peripheral capabilities that are seldom used. [28]
In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]
1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K math problems and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step options. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The benefit design was a process reward design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd approach. [30] This benefit model was then utilized to train Instruct utilizing group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K math concerns “associated to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward model was constantly updated during training to prevent benefit hacking. This resulted in the RL design.
V2
In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series consists of 4 models, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The two larger models were trained as follows: [31]
1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K using YaRN. [32] This resulted in DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M instances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for safety. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in 2 stages. The very first stage was trained to resolve mathematics and coding issues. This stage utilized 1 benefit model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The second phase was trained to be helpful, safe, and follow guidelines. This stage utilized 3 reward designs. The helpfulness and safety reward models were trained on human preference data. The rule-based reward model was by hand programmed. All skilled reward designs were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the released version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.
They went with 2-staged RL, because they found that RL on thinking data had “unique attributes” different from RL on basic information. For example, RL on reasoning might improve over more training steps. [31]
The 2 V2-Lite designs were smaller sized, and qualified similarly, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat just went through SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to help “more research and advancement on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]
Architecturally, the V2 models were significantly customized from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the standard attention system by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and utilized the mixture of specialists (MoE) alternative previously published in January. [28]
The Financial Times reported that it was more affordable than its peers with a cost of 2 RMB for every single million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]
In June 2024, they launched 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]
1. The Base designs were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained further for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were utilized to generate 20K code-related and 30K math-related guideline data, then integrated with an instruction dataset of 300M tokens. This was used for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for math issues was computed by comparing with the ground-truth label. The benefit for code issues was produced by a benefit model trained to anticipate whether a program would pass the system tests.
DeepSeek-V2.5 was launched in September and upgraded in December 2024. It was made by integrating DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]
V3
In December 2024, they released a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat design DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is basically the same as V2. They were trained as follows: [37]
1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mainly English and Chinese. It contained a greater ratio of math and shows than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length twice, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 epochs on 1.5 M samples of thinking (math, programs, reasoning) and non-reasoning (imaginative writing, roleplay, easy concern answering) information. Reasoning data was created by “expert models”. Non-reasoning data was produced by DeepSeek-V2.5 and checked by human beings. – The “skilled designs” were trained by starting with an undefined base design, then SFT on both data, and synthetic information produced by an internal DeepSeek-R1 model. The system prompt asked the R1 to reflect and validate during thinking. Then the specialist designs were RL using an undefined benefit function.
– Each specialist design was trained to produce simply synthetic thinking information in one particular domain (mathematics, programs, logic).
– Expert designs were utilized, instead of R1 itself, given that the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, bad format, and excessive length”.
4. Model-based benefit models were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference information consisting of both last reward and chain-of-thought resulting in the last reward. The reward model produced benefit signals for both concerns with unbiased however free-form answers, and questions without unbiased responses (such as creative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both benefit models and rule-based reward. The rule-based reward was computed for mathematics issues with a final answer (put in a box), and for shows problems by unit tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.
The DeepSeek group performed comprehensive low-level engineering to achieve effectiveness. They used mixed-precision arithmetic. Much of the forward pass was carried out in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) instead of the basic 32-bit, needing unique GEMM regimens to collect precisely. They utilized a custom-made 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the direct layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They reduced the communication latency by overlapping extensively computation and communication, such as devoting 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for only inter-GPU interaction. They lowered communication by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the precise maker each specialist was on in order to prevent particular makers being queried regularly than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing techniques. [37]
After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are linked by InfiniBand. [37]
Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 outshined Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]
R1
On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview became accessible by means of DeepSeek’s API, along with via a chat user interface after logging in. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for sensible reasoning, mathematical reasoning, and real-time analytical. DeepSeek claimed that it exceeded performance of OpenAI o1 on standards such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal specified when it utilized 15 issues from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached an option quicker than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]
On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The business also released some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, but rather are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial data generated by R1. [47]
A discussion between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant fixes it. The assistant first considers the reasoning process in the mind and after that offers the user with the response. The thinking process and answer are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., reasoning procedure here address here. User:. Assistant:
DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained solely utilizing GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they utilized no model-based benefit. All reward functions were rule-based, “generally” of two types (other types were not defined): precision benefits and format benefits. Accuracy benefit was checking whether a boxed answer is right (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for programming). Format reward was examining whether the design puts its thinking trace within … [47]
As R1-Zero has concerns with readability and mixing languages, R1 was trained to resolve these issues and further improve thinking: [47]
1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” information all with the basic format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the very same RL process as R1-Zero, however likewise with a “language consistency reward” to encourage it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal model not released.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking information from the internal design, with rejection sampling (i.e. if the generated reasoning had a wrong final response, then it is eliminated). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning data (writing, factual QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic data for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for reasoning jobs) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning tasks, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.
Distilled models were trained by SFT on 800K information manufactured from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar method as step 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]
Assessment and reactions
DeepSeek released its AI Assistant, which uses the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually exceeded ChatGPT as the highest-rated totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot reportedly answers questions, solves reasoning problems and composes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests used by American AI business. [3]
DeepSeek-V3 uses considerably less resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers using as numerous as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek claims to have required just about 2,000 GPUs, namely the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is approximately one tenth of what United States tech giant Meta invested developing its latest AI innovation. [3]
DeepSeek’s competitive performance at reasonably very little cost has actually been acknowledged as possibly challenging the worldwide dominance of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, explained the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik moment” for American AI. [49] [50] The efficiency of its R1 model was reportedly “on par with” among OpenAI’s newest designs when utilized for tasks such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other commentators, American Silicon Valley investor Marc Andreessen also described R1 as “AI’s Sputnik minute”. [51]
DeepSeek’s founder, Liang Wenfeng has actually been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media extensively praised DeepSeek as a national property. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang welcomed Liang Wenfeng to his seminar with experts and asked him to supply viewpoints and tips on a draft for remarks of the annual 2024 government work report. [55]
DeepSeek’s optimization of limited resources has actually highlighted prospective limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, which include export limitations on sophisticated AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI models as a result “triggered market chaos” [57] and caused shares in significant worldwide innovation companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech firms also sank, consisting of Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip equipment maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A worldwide selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, triggered by the release of the R1 model, had caused tape losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of worth was rubbed out American stocks. [50]
Leading figures in the American AI sector had mixed reactions to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose companies are involved in the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to establish American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “incredibly excellent”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who revealed The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed hesitation of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to use the model in their program. [68]
On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek limited its brand-new user registration to telephone number from mainland China, email addresses, or Google account logins, following a “large-scale” cyberattack interfered with the proper performance of its servers. [69] [70]
Some sources have actually observed that the main application programs user interface (API) version of R1, which ranges from servers found in China, utilizes censorship systems for subjects that are considered politically delicate for the government of China. For example, the model refuses to answer concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, comparisons between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI may at first produce an answer, but then erases it quickly later on and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my current scope. Let’s discuss something else.” [72] The incorporated censorship systems and limitations can only be eliminated to a minimal extent in the open-source version of the R1 model. If the “core socialist worths” specified by the Chinese Internet regulative authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are ended. [74] When evaluated by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s area,” and mentioned: “We securely oppose any type of ‘Taiwan self-reliance’ separatist activities and are dedicated to attaining the total reunification of the motherland through serene means.” [75] In January 2025, Western researchers had the ability to fool DeepSeek into providing specific responses to some of these subjects by requesting in its response to swap particular letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]
Security and personal privacy
Some experts fear that the government of China might use the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading out disinformation, monitoring and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s personal privacy conditions say “We store the details we collect in protected servers located in the People’s Republic of China … We might collect your text or audio input, prompt, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you provide to our design and Services”. Although the data storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s privacy policy, [79] a Wired short article reports this as security concerns. [80] In response, the Italian data security authority is seeking additional information on DeepSeek’s collection and use of individual information, and the United States National Security Council revealed that it had actually started a national security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government banned the use of DeepSeek at government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened an inquiry into DeepSeek’s use of personal details. [83]
Expert system industry in China.
Notes
^ a b c The number of heads does not equivalent the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the model called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed selecting “Deep Think made it possible for”, and every user might utilize it just 50 times a day.
References
^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s low-cost, open AI model DeepSeek thrills researchers”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world prepared to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s more affordable designs and weaker chips cast doubt on trillions in AI infrastructure costs”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports might strike India’s AI ambitions”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals widening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you must know”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to slump?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares topple as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a leading Chinese AI model overcame US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is altering how AI designs are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at primary · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model exceeds Meta, OpenAI items”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, exceeds Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design seems one of the best ‘open’ challengers yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: letting loose supercharged reasoning power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the initial on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s first thinking design R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 efficiency”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, but China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs through Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI startup DeepSeek overtakes ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has actually reached its Sputnik minute”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik moment’: $1tn cleaned off US stocks after Chinese firm unveils AI chatbot” – via The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI start-up that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek poses an obstacle to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika says”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 , 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI company’s AI design breakthrough highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot stimulates US market turmoil, wiping $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek stimulates worldwide AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella promotes DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “incredibly excellent”: “We must take the developments out of China very, really seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘outstanding'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson slams China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek advancement “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – via NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman praises: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s interruption”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests massive Nvidia GPU infrastructure”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS clients, including Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek struck with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app shops”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek temporarily restricted brand-new sign-ups, citing ‘large-scale destructive attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has stimulated a $1 trillion panic – and it doesn’t appreciate free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship looks like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We attempted out DeepSeek. It worked well, till we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, development and the increase of chaos”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, giving the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI postures powerful cyber, data privacy hazards”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts urge caution over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has painted a huge TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on information security”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House assesses effect of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, authorities says”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.